matrix overlay and deja vous voo voo voo
the phenomena/process under consideration here is the iteration of history[ history as scene and as seen from a particular reference point nexusof normative,uncritical, understanding]
it involves:
-perception management as directed at general non specialist public, with the aim of embedding narrative - as substrate preparation for future viewpoint reality-sculpture
-popular discourse characterisation and perameter moulding
- thus iteration of history - through selection and frequency of repeated argument
- fading out or diluting independent counter reference nexus views
- by amplification of normative narrative
- making use of consensus which may be called "the democracy of opinion"
[one persons opinion = one numerator's worth of denominator of truth value on that particular subject nexus]
- seeding substrate with emotive "precircuits" and precircuit response pathways/logics?using techniques including:
- self/other identification,
- opinion/truth equality,
- linear representation/extension from atypical example
- replacement of logical syntax with emotional syntax
- reflected validity of "home reference point nexus"
- conformity multipliers
- "membership" validation
also to be noted:
- evolution/creation of specialist arenas for specialist opinion cited in main stream under the rubric of "democracy of opinion"
specific time link example
chomsky complaint re guardian [uk] interview/mis-interview, hariri report pressure link to syria, uk tory/conservative leadership race, iran leadership comments re- israel
not related in subject - related in time
time one: first iteration: late october - approximately 24th to 28th
time two: second iteration: early/mid december
which other agendas bought time and/or were scripted to this time period/loop
considerations: scripting, marketing, coding, masking, prioritising, emergence,layering, complementing,scheduling etc
another overlaying loopback of time- as example
ken livingston in the "media" dock - the old associated press[ap]/ anti-semitism furore and reporter[time one]
what else is going on now[time2 : mid-late december], that happened at the same time as time one
interesting questions/leads from the point of view of the concerned individual
1. organisations are more likely to have database/archive of time linked stories and archives - according to thesis postulated- the key to the process- a functional memory of sorts- and of greater sophistication than laity or public. certain functions relating to the power to represent/deploy this sophistication in array, and subscribership give an approximation of position of organisation in heirarchy of cultural reference nexus power.
2. i- net searches at time two will not reflect the same complex of associated stories as at time one- perhaps allowing for an analysis of "resolving" or "polarising" iteration.
3. non organised folks who get vexed first time around - are less likely to persue the matter second time round. - for various reasons [to be detailed later]
medialens scenario - a slightly different subject - take note other orgs
solving with relevence for chomsky scenario we find some strangely illustrative things for example, labelling , perhaps true, of medialens as an electronic lobby group, raises the game and while simultaneously calling medialens bluff, elevates them to a position above zero in the information/ heirarchy matrix - whilst parring them as a lobby group - psyching the groups self referential identification in aloopback move - 1] the "illusion?" of non partisanship is called into question , 2] allows future self referential psyching from guardian , to repeat the characterisation. 3] allows for other publications to bracket medialens with other lobbies- many[not all] that medialens would have huge ideological difference with- 4.] encourages medialens to persue archiving capabilities- a facility that in itself presents other problems... copywrite, censorship of input, etc, spotlight on org itself, linkage of organisation to individuals who make use of the facility..... etc
these are quick thoughts - this page will change when i have the time- later on today- feel free to criticise
medialens has indeed been promoted[from a brigade]- and the fractal moves along - a blessing an a curse.
- realitystructure
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home