bright report conclusions cloned

5 years may be a "longitudinal/long term" study
of the integrity of baked beans in a can on a supermarket shelf.

but not for this :

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/12/28/cloned.food.ap/index.html

the conclusions and media presentation thereof
seeming to have come from the parental
pseudo-science cell line used in the BRIGHT report:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4046427.stm

mind you if a company can own a gene element of the organism/product,

and things like this can happen :

http://www.organicconsumers.org/ge/110405.cfm

careful where you shit.

...

which brings me to my man here:

http://www.gene.ch/genet/2001/Jan/msg00080.html

and here:

http://www.organicconsumers.org/biod/africa050404.cfm

and then theres this guy here: [sorry bout the medline funnel/filter ]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8335231&dopt=Abstract

and here:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=8335232

and if you are what you eat.......


- realitystructure