who [mis]manages the archetype - and who doesn't? - who gave them that right?
if an archetype is installed, or is managed with understanding emphasised through the focused lens, that ends in war;
then regardless of any wisdom, truth, lifelessons, or day to day livity proscriptions, explicitly coded into the body - for example: the requirement to value human life of all of god's sons [to use a religious framework],
then that last scene, [ends in war], will ensure, if the focus is saturated, that those under such an operated system, will cascade into reinforcing the prophecy, and that very, distant, literary and mythological device, that may have served to provide perspective for present day behaviour, will in deceitful application, promote an passive eagerness, a fatalism glossed, manifesting its fulfillment, in blissful symmetry.
the author is a human being and has contributed to life as he has found it for well over 30 years.
one could argue that his contribution goes back at least 13 billion years - but thats a bit off the wall.
one could also argue that the author is "mad as a brush".
he is known for gaining his 5m breaststroke swimming certificate many years ago.
the author has also singly published several doodles and ramblings - both to himself, others, the ether and on many disregarded scraps of paper, bookmarks, backs of rizzla packets, etc. unfortunately due to the inability to manifest and rewrite akashik records, many of these incredible and revolutionary ideas are not available to the general public.
the author's favourite and most profound quotes are :
"mama" and "dada" , though not neccessarily in that order.
- indeed much controversy is still extant on this issue - the author having been accused of plagiarism by his grandparents, amongst others.
- attempts to copywrite these quotes has so far resulted in laughter and abuse.
think kindly.
realitystructure 9th feb 06